6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125ce0d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Sequential and joint hydrogeophysical inversion using a field-scale groundwater model with ERT and TDEM data
Daan HerckenrathDaan HerckenrathGianluca FiandacaGianluca FiandacaEsben AukenPeter Bauer-gottweinsubject
lcsh:GE1-350Hydrologylcsh:TEstimation theoryPetrophysicslcsh:Geography. Anthropology. RecreationModel parametersSoil scienceInversion (meteorology)Computer simulationlcsh:Technologylcsh:TD1-1066Geophysicslcsh:GParameter estimationElectrical resistivity tomographylcsh:Environmental technology. Sanitary engineeringGroundwater modelGroundwaterlcsh:Environmental sciencesGroundwaterGeologySlightly worsedescription
Abstract. Increasingly, ground-based and airborne geophysical datasets are used to inform groundwater models. Recent research focuses on establishing coupling relationships between geophysical and groundwater parameters. To fully exploit such information, this paper presents and compares a joint hydrogeophysical inversion (JHI) approach and sequential hydrogeophysical inversion (SHI) approach to inform a field-scale groundwater model with Time Domain Electromagnetic (TDEM) and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) data. The implemented SHI coupled inverted geophysical models with groundwater parameters, where the strength of the coupling was based on geophysical parameter resolution. To test whether the implemented SHI over- or underestimated the coupling strength between groundwater and geophysical model, we compared its results with a JHI in which a geophysical model is simultaneously inverted with a groundwater model using additional coupling constraints that explicitly account for an established petrophysical relationship and its accuracy. The first set of simulations for a synthetic groundwater model and TDEM data, employing a high-quality petrophysical and geometric relationship, showed improved estimates for groundwater model parameters that were coupled to relative well-resolved geophysical parameters. Compared to a SHI these improvements were insignificant and geophysical parameter estimates became slightly worse. In a second set of simulations, employing a low-quality petrophysical relationship, groundwater parameter improved less for both the SHI and JHI, where the SHI performed slightly better. For a real-world groundwater model and ERT data, different parameter estimates were obtained with a JHI and SHI. Parameter uncertainty was reduced but was similar for the SHI and JHI. The geometric constraint showed little impact while the petrophysical constraint showed significant changes in geophysical and groundwater parameters. For both cases investigated in this paper, the SHI seems favorable, taking in account parameter error, data fit and the complexity of implementing a JHI in combination with its larger computational burden.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013-01-01 |