6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125d903

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Benchmarking of strength models for unidirectional composites under longitudinal tension

Ian SinclairAnthony R. BunsellMark SpearingHannah MortonSoraia PimentaLarissa GorbatikhYentl SwolfsAlain ThionnetAlain Thionnet

subject

TechnologyMaterials scienceComposite numberMaterials Science02 engineering and technologyFiber-reinforced composite0901 Aerospace EngineeringEngineering0203 mechanical engineeringFragmentationUltimate tensile strengthMicro-mechanicsCOMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHYLOAD-TRANSFERComposite material0912 Materials EngineeringMaterialsStress concentrationEPOXY COMPOSITESTRESS-CONCENTRATIONSScience & TechnologyDAMAGE ACCUMULATIONTension (physics)FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITESPolymer-matrix compositesExperimental dataMicromechanics021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologyFinite element methodEngineering Manufacturing020303 mechanical engineering & transportsWIDE FAILURE EXERCISEMechanics of MaterialsMaterials Science CompositesHYBRID COMPOSITES[PHYS.COND.CM-MS]Physics [physics]/Condensed Matter [cond-mat]/Materials Science [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]Ceramics and CompositesStrength0210 nano-technologyFINITE-ELEMENT0913 Mechanical Engineering

description

© 2018 Elsevier Ltd Several modelling approaches are available in the literature to predict longitudinal tensile failure of fibre-reinforced polymers. However, a systematic, blind and unbiased comparison between the predictions from the different models and against experimental data has never been performed. This paper presents a benchmarking exercise performed for three different models from the literature: (i) an analytical hierarchical scaling law for composite fibre bundles, (ii) direct numerical simulations of composite fibre bundles, and (iii) a multiscale finite-element simulation method. The results show that there are significant discrepancies between the predictions of the different modelling approaches for fibre-break density evolution, cluster formation and ultimate strength, and that each of the three models presents unique advantages over the others. Blind model predictions are also compared against detailed computed-tomography experiments, showing that our understanding of the micromechanics of longitudinal tensile failure of composites needs to be developed further. ispartof: COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING vol:111 pages:138-150 status: published

10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.016http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/61013