6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125d976
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination compared with intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in diabetic subjects with and without metabolic syndrome.
Philippe BrudiMary E. HansonJ. B. RosenR. MassaadJoseph TriscariValdis PiragsJ. G. Jimenezsubject
Blood GlucoseMaleSimvastatinEndocrinology Diabetes and MetabolismAtorvastatinEzetimibe Simvastatin Drug CombinationPharmacologyEndocrinologyAtorvastatinMedicineRosuvastatin CalciumMetabolic SyndromeSulfonamidesAnticholesteremic AgentsFastingMiddle AgedDrug CombinationsTreatment OutcomeTolerabilityCardiovascular Diseaseslipids (amino acids peptides and proteins)Drug Therapy CombinationFemalemedicine.drugAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyStatinAdolescentmedicine.drug_classUrologyDrug Administration ScheduleEzetimibeDouble-Blind MethodDiabetes mellitusInternal MedicineHumansRosuvastatinPyrrolescardiovascular diseasesAgedApolipoproteins Bbusiness.industrynutritional and metabolic diseasesCholesterol LDLmedicine.diseaseFluorobenzenesDiabetes Mellitus Type 1PyrimidinesDiabetes Mellitus Type 2SimvastatinHeptanoic AcidsAzetidinesMetabolic syndromebusinessDiabetic Angiopathiesdescription
Aims The objective was to assess the consistency of effect of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg versus doubling the baseline statin dose (to simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg across subgroups of subjects with (n = 617) and without (n = 191) metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, 6-week study of adults 18–79 years with cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥70 and ≤160 mg/dl. The percent change in LDL-C and other lipids was estimated within each subgroup separately. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Results In subjects with MetS, percent changes in LDL-C and other lipids were greater with ezetimibe/simvastatin versus doubling baseline statin or numerically greater versus switching to rosuvastatin, except high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein (Apo) AI (mean percent changes in LDL-C were: −22.49% ezetimibe/simvastatin, −9.64% doubled baseline statin and −19.20% rosuvastatin). In subjects without MetS, percent changes in LDL-C, total cholesterol and Apo B were greater with ezetimibe/simvastatin versus doubling baseline statin or numerically greater versus switching to rosuvastatin (mean percent changes in LDL-C were: −25.14% ezetimibe/simvastatin, −4.75% doubled baseline statin and −19.75% rosuvastatin). Safety profiles were generally similar. Conclusion These results showed that switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg was more effective at reducing LDL-C, total cholesterol and Apo B versus doubling the baseline statin dose to simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg regardless of MetS status. These results were generally similar to those of the full cohort.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-10-22 | Diabetes, obesitymetabolism |