6533b7d2fe1ef96bd125f61a
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Measurement of the local aortic stiffness by a non-invasive bioelectrical impedance technique.
Serge WilloteauxGeorges LeftheriotisAlain LalandeMathieu ColletteAnne Humeausubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyBiomedical Engineering[INFO.INFO-IM] Computer Science [cs]/Medical Imaging030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyCardiography Impedance03 medical and health sciencesVascular Stiffness0302 clinical medicineNuclear magnetic resonanceInternal medicinemedicine.arterymedicine[INFO.INFO-IM]Computer Science [cs]/Medical ImagingHumansPulse wave velocityAortaAgedAortamedicine.diagnostic_test[ INFO.INFO-IM ] Computer Science [cs]/Medical Imagingbusiness.industryModels CardiovascularSignal Processing Computer-AssistedMagnetic resonance imagingMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputer Science ApplicationsImpedance cardiographyDragCardiologyArterial stiffnessFemaleAortic stiffnessElectrophysiologic Techniques CardiacbusinessBioelectrical impedance analysisAlgorithms030217 neurology & neurosurgerydescription
International audience; Aortic stiffness measurement is well recognized as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Recently, a simple method has been proposed for the evaluation of the local aortic stiffness (AoStiff) using a non-invasive bioelectrical impedance (BI) technique. This approach relies on a novel interpretation of the arterial stiffness where AoStiff is computed from the measurement of two new BI variables: (1) the local aortic flow resistance (AoRes) exerted by the drag forces onto the flow; (2) the local aortic wall distensibility (AoDist). Herein, we propose to detail and compare these three indices with the reference pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement and the direct assessment of the aortic drag forces (DF) and distensibility (DS) obtained by the magnetic resonance imaging technique. Our results show a significant correlation between AoStiff and PWV (r = 0.79; P < 0.0001; 120 patients at rest; mean age 44 ± 16 years), and also between AoRes and DF (r = 0.95; P = 0.0011) and between AoDist and DS (r = 0.93; P = 0.0022) on eight patients at rest (mean age 52 ± 19 years). These first results suggest that local aortic stiffness can be explored reliably by the BI technique.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011-01-01 |