6533b7d3fe1ef96bd126026d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Posaconazole or Fluconazole for Prophylaxis in Severe Graft-versus-Host Disease
Simon DurrantPranatharthi H. ChandrasekarAndrew J. UllmannWellington Morais De AzevedoAmelia LangstonHernando PatinoJeffrey H. LiptonDavid H. VesoleStefano R. TarantoloHildegard GreinixVijay ReddyLisa D. PediconeNavdeep Boparaisubject
AdultMalePosaconazolemedicine.medical_specialtyAntifungal AgentsAdolescentmedicine.medical_treatmentGraft vs Host DiseaseKaplan-Meier EstimateHematopoietic stem cell transplantationOpportunistic InfectionsAspergillosisDouble-Blind MethodRisk FactorsInternal medicinemedicineClinical endpointAspergillosisHumansFluconazoleAgedbusiness.industryIncidence (epidemiology)Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationGeneral MedicineMiddle AgedTriazolesmedicine.diseaseSurgeryTransplantationGraft-versus-host diseaseMycosesFemalebusinessFluconazolemedicine.drugdescription
Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.In an international, randomized, double-blind trial, we compared oral posaconazole with oral fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) who were receiving immunosuppressive therapy. The primary end point was the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections from randomization to day 112 of the fixed treatment period of the study.Of a total of 600 patients, 301 were assigned to posaconazole and 299 to fluconazole. At the end of the fixed 112-day treatment period, posaconazole was found to be as effective as fluconazole in preventing all invasive fungal infections (incidence, 5.3% and 9.0%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 1.07; P=0.07) and was superior to fluconazole in preventing proven or probable invasive aspergillosis (2.3% vs. 7.0%; odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.75; P=0.006). While patients were receiving study medications (exposure period), in the posaconazole group, as compared with the fluconazole group, there were fewer breakthrough invasive fungal infections (2.4% vs. 7.6%, P=0.004), particularly invasive aspergillosis (1.0% vs. 5.9%, P=0.001). Overall mortality was similar in the two groups, but the number of deaths from invasive fungal infections was lower in the posaconazole group (1%, vs. 4% in the fluconazole group; P=0.046). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (36% in the posaconazole group and 38% in the fluconazole group), and the rates of treatment-related serious adverse events were 13% and 10%, respectively.Posaconazole was similar to fluconazole for prophylaxis against fungal infections among patients with GVHD. It was superior in preventing invasive aspergillosis and reducing the rate of deaths related to fungal infections. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00034645 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007-01-25 | New England Journal of Medicine |