6533b7d3fe1ef96bd12609be

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Social equity and marine protected areas: Perceptions of small-scale fishermen in the Mediterranean Sea

Daniela MarzoMarco MilazzoPaolo GuidettiValentina CappaneraAntonio Di FrancoAntonio Di FrancoIlenia DominaFederico NiccoliniNathan J. BennettNathan J. BennettCharalampos DimitriadisEric CharbonnelJosé Antonio García-chartonMarie-catherine SantoniFrancisco SobradoLuka KastelicLeila SeddikiAntonio CalòAntonio CalòJosipa GrbinMaria Trujillo

subject

0106 biological sciencesSocial equitymedia_common.quotation_subjectPositive perception010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesMediterranean seaPerception14. Life underwaterMarine protected areas management and organization; Environmental governance; Small-scale fisheries; Conservation social science; Social equityEcology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsEnvironmental governanceNature and Landscape Conservationmedia_commonSmall-scale fisheriesEquity (economics)Public economicsStakeholder perceptions010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyConservation social scienceConservation social science Environmental governance Marine protected areas Protected area management Small-scale fisheries Social equityLivelihoodGeographyMarine protected areas management and organizationMarine protected areaSocial equality

description

Abstract Global conservation policy requires the scaling up of effectively and equitably managed networks of marine protected areas (MPAs). While progress has been made on spatial coverage, the fundamental aspects of effectiveness and equity are falling short. Past research has focused on management effectiveness in MPAs, but less attention has been given to social equity though it is an ethical imperative and instrumental to conservation. This study assessed the perceptions of SSF regarding recognitional, procedural and distributional dimensions of social equity using quantitative surveys in 11 MPAs across 6 countries on the Mediterranean Sea. To do so, we developed individual indicators from which we created composite scores for recognitional, procedural, and distributional equity, and a combined social equity score. Overall, descriptive results showed that SSF perceptions of social equity were quite varied but slightly skewed towards positive perceptions. Then, we developed predictive models to analyze the effects of geographic (i.e., MPA and country) and individual (i.e., SSF demographics and characteristics) factors on the composite social equity scores. All social equity scores differed significantly between MPAs. Being an older fisher was associated with a decrease in recognitional equity, while having a higher level of relative wealth or more diversified livelihoods was associated with higher scores for distributional equity. These results point to the need for tailored management actions to improve equity in different MPA sites and for different groups. This paper presents a novel quantitative method for using stakeholder perceptions to examine social equity that might be applied to marine and terrestrial conservation initiatives elsewhere.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108531