6533b7d3fe1ef96bd1261462
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Model-based approach to describe G-CSF effects in carboplatin-treated cancer patients.
Etienne ChatelutMélanie L. PastorMélanie L. PastorLaurence GladieffCéline M. LaffontDidier ConcordetAntonin Schmittsubject
AdultMaleOncologymedicine.medical_specialtyNeutrophilsmedicine.medical_treatment[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]Pharmaceutical ScienceAntineoplastic AgentsNeutropeniaModels Biological030226 pharmacology & pharmacyCarboplatinLeukocyte CountYoung Adult03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicinePharmacokineticsNeoplasmsInternal medicineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactormedicineHumansComputer SimulationPharmacology (medical)Young adultIntensive care medicinePrior informationAgedAged 80 and overPharmacologyChemotherapy[ SDV ] Life Sciences [q-bio]business.industryOrganic ChemistryCancerMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseCarboplatin3. Good healthchemistry030220 oncology & carcinogenesisPharmacodynamicsMolecular MedicineFemalebusinessBiotechnologydescription
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often used in cancer patients receiving cytotoxic drugs to prevent or reduce high grade neutropenia. We propose a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to describe myelotoxicity in both G-CSF treated and non-treated patients that shall increase our understanding of G-CSF effects. The model was built from absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) obtained in 375 carboplatin-treated patients, 47 of whom received G-CSF. It includes some prior information on G-CSF taken from the literature. Simulations were performed to understand differences in G-CSF effects and explore the impact of G-CSF formulation. Our model well described the data in all patients. Model simulations showed that G-CSF was not as beneficial as expected in some patients. Furthermore, a longer and stronger effect was observed for the pegylated formulation in comparison with the daily standard formulation even if the latter was given for 11 consecutive days. The proposed model allows a mechanistic interpretation of G-CSF effects on ANC and raises the question of a systematic beneficial effect of G-CSF treatment. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings and help identifying patients for whom G-CSF is beneficial.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013-01-01 |