6533b7d3fe1ef96bd12614ab

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?

Manuel PereaManuel Carreiras

subject

PhysiologyDecision MakingExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyVocabulary050105 experimental psychologyAssociation030507 speech-language pathology & audiology03 medical and health sciencesPrime (symbol)PhoneticsPhysiology (medical)Similarity (psychology)Lexical decision taskReaction TimeHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesControl (linguistics)StudentsGeneral PsychologyLanguage05 social sciencesPhonologyGeneral MedicineLinguisticsNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPattern Recognition VisualReadingWord recognitionCues0305 other medical sciencePsychologyPriming (psychology)Perceptual MaskingOrthographyCognitive psychology

description

Nonwords created by transposing two letters (e.g., RELOVUTION) are very effective at activating the lexical representation of their base words (Perea & Lupker, 2004). In the present study, we examined whether the nature of transposed-letter (TL) similarity effects was purely orthographic or whether it could also have a phonological component. Specifically, we examined transposed-letter similarity effects for nonwords created by transposing two nonadjacent letters (e.g., relovución– REVOLUCIÓN) in a masked form priming experiment using the lexical decision task (Experiment 1). The controls were (a) a pseudohomophone of the transposed-letter prime ( relobución– REVOLUCIÓN; note that B and V are pronounced as /b/ in Spanish) or (b) an orthographic control ( relodución– REVOLUCIÓN). Results showed a similar advantage of the TL nonword condition over the phonological and the orthographic control conditions. Experiment 2 showed a masked phonological priming effect when the letter positions in the prime were in the right order. In a third experiment, using a single-presentation lexical decision task, TL nonwords produced longer latencies than the orthographic and phonological controls, whereas there was only a small phonological effect restricted to the error data. These results suggest that TL similarity effects are orthographic—rather than phonological—in nature.

10.1080/17470210500298880https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16873111