6533b7d3fe1ef96bd1261594

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Bene vivere politice

Jussi Backman

subject

Tuomas Akvinolainensupreme goodAristotelespoliittinen osallistuminenkeskiajan filosofiaelämänlaatupoliittinen filosofiahyväArendt HannahbiopoliticsHobbes ThomasAristotleThomas AquinasFoucault Michelhappinessmetabiopolitiikkaantiikin filosofiabiopolitiikkaonnellisuushyvä elämäOjakangas Mikametabiopolitics

description

Abstract This chapter approaches the question of biopolitics in ancient political thought looking not at specific political techniques but at notions of the final aim of the political community. It argues that the “happiness” (eudaimonia, beatitudo) that constitutes the greatest human good in the tradition from Aristotle to Thomas Aquinas is not a “biopolitical” ideal, but rather a metabiopolitical one, consisting in a contemplative activity situated above and beyond the biological and the political. It is only with Thomas Hobbes that civic happiness becomes “biopolitically” identified with simple survival; for modernity, as Hannah Arendt puts it, mere being alive becomes the greatest human good, and happiness is understood as a subjective “quality of life.” In both models, the political realm is a means to an end. Arendt draws our attention to a neglected third alternative to both the classical/metabiopolitical and the modern/biopolitical ideals: “public happiness” consisting in political participation itself.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847102.003.0007