6533b7d4fe1ef96bd1261e86

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Improved Properties of the Big Five Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Expanded Format Relative to the Likert Format.

Victoria SavaleiWinnie Wing-yee TseXijuan Zhang

subject

Scale (ratio)big five inventoryOrder effectlcsh:BF1-990Applied psychologyExpanded formatRosenberg Self-Esteem Scale050105 experimental psychologyLikert scale03 medical and health sciencesBig Five Inventory0302 clinical medicinePsychology0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesGeneral PsychologyPsychological scaleOriginal Researchmethod effectacquiescence bias05 social sciencesRosenberg self-esteem scaleLikert formatlcsh:Psychologynegatively worded itemsorder effectAcquiescence biasPsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Previous research by Zhang and Savalei (2015) proposed an alternative scale format to the Likert scale format: the Expanded format. Scale items in the Expanded format present both positively worded and negatively worded sentences as response options for each scale item; therefore, they were less affected by the acquiescence bias and method effects that often occur in the Likert scale items. The major goal of the current study is to further demonstrate the superiority of the Expanded format to the Likert format across different psychological scales. Specifically, we aim to replicate the findings of Zhang and Savalei and to determine whether order effect exists in the Expanded format scales. Six psychological scales were examined in the study, including the five subscales of the big five inventory (BFI) and the Rosenberg self-esteem (RSE) scale. Four versions were created for each psychological scale. One version was the original scale in the Likert format. The other three versions were in different Expanded formats that varied in the order of the response options. For each scale, the participant was randomly assigned to complete one scale version. Across the different versions of each scale, we compared the factor structures and the distributions of the response options. Our results successfully replicated the findings of Zhang and Savalei, and also showed that order effect was generally absent in the Expanded format scales. Based on these promising findings, we encourage researchers to use the Expanded format for these and other scales in their substantive research.

10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01286https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31214090