6533b7d4fe1ef96bd126266e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Are Low Prices Compromises Collusion Guarantees? An Experimental Analysis of Price Matching Policies

Enrique FatasEnrique FatasJuan A. Mañez

subject

TheoryofComputation_MISCELLANEOUSMicroeconomicsCollusionMarket institutionEconomicsTheoryofComputation_GENERALStrategic managementConvergence (economics)Experimental economicsPrice matchingOutcome (game theory)

description

In this paper we experimentally test the ability of Price-Matching Guarantees (PMG) to rise prices above the competitive level. We implement three different treatments of symmetric duopolies to check the effect of PMG both as a market institution and as a business strategy. In the absence of any low-price guarantee, prices get close to the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium although in the 50 rounds of the experiment no full convergence is obtained. The existence of PMG as an institution in a market where firms decide only about prices results in a clear collusive outcome as all markets quickly and fully converge to the collusive prediction. If we allow subjects to decide whether they adopt price matching or not we observe that almost all subjects decide to adopt PMG; prices significantly increases over the first treatment observed prices and are very close to the collusive ones.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.283178