6533b7d5fe1ef96bd1263dd6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The HEXACO–100 Across 16 Languages

Zsofia SzirmakAntonio ChirumboloBoban PetrovićAmparo BellochKibeom LeeTereza ZáškodnáOksana V. ParshikovaPiotr SzarotaPetar ČOlovićJános NagyPaweł IzdebskiIngo ZettlerToni BabarovićIva ŠVerkoEstrella RomeroMarco PeruginiLuigi LeoneMichael C. AshtonDaniel DostálAkio WakabayashiIda SergiS. Arzu WastiReinout E. De VriesKang Hyun ShinAugusto GnisciTimo HeydaschArkun TatarRobin BerghIsabel ThielmannNazar AkramiBernd MarcusMarina S. EgorovaKung Yu HsuSnežana SmederevacBenjamin E. HilbigJanko Međedović

subject

AdultCross-Cultural ComparisonMalePersonality InventoryPsychometricsHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesismedia_common.quotation_subjectScale testBig SixhexacoArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)factorial invarianceHEXACO cross-cultural invariancePersonality triPersonalityCross-culturalHumansMeasurement invarianceBig Five personality traitsmedia_commonCross-culturalESEMCross-cultural studiesn/a OA procedureClinical PsychologypersonalitySEMpersonality; hexaco; ESEM; factorial invarianceFemalePsychologyCognitive psychology

description

The HEXACO Personality Inventory–Revised (HEXACO–PI–R) has become one of the most heavily applied measurement tools for the assessment of basic personality traits. Correspondingly, the inventory has been translated to many languages for use in cross-cultural research. However, formal tests examining whether the different language versions of the HEXACO–PI–R provide equivalent measures of the 6 personality dimensions are missing. We provide a large-scale test of measurement invariance of the 100-item version of the HEXACO–PI–R across 16 languages spoken in European and Asian countries (N = 30,484). Multigroup exploratory structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analyses revealed consistent support for configural and metric invariance, thus implying that the factor structure of the HEXACO dimensions as well as the meaning of the latent HEXACO factors is comparable across languages. However, analyses did not show overall support for scalar invariance; that is, equivalence of facet intercepts. A complementary alignment analysis supported this pattern, but also revealed substantial heterogeneity in the level of (non)invariance across facets and factors. Overall, results imply that the HEXACO–PI–R provides largely comparable measurement of the HEXACO dimensions, although the lack of scalar invariance highlights the necessity for future research clarifying the interpretation of mean-level trait differences across countries.

10.1080/00223891.2019.1614011https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1614011