6533b7d6fe1ef96bd1265ae5

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Prosodic Phrasing and Transitivity in Head-Final Sentence Comprehension – ERP Evidence from German Ambiguous DPs

subject

description

In this article, we present an ERP study investigating the neurophysiological correlates of the interplay between prosodic phrasing and case information in head-final sentence processing. We examine German DP1-DP2-V constructions, in which the second DP can either be interpreted as a possessive modifier of the first DP (one-participant reading), or as a verbal argument (two-participant reading). An N400 on the determiner of the second DP is observed when either case information or prosodic phrasing biased toward the establishment of a two-participant reading, thus reflecting local processing costs associated with the introduction of a transitive event. By contrast, when the DPs are integrated with the logical structure of the clause-final verb, a general advantage for the two-argument interpretation is observed: An N400 for intransitive as opposed to transitive verbs is found. This argument preference is even stronger when prosodic phrasing information rules out a transitive interpretation. The results are discussed with regard to current ERP data from head-final constructions in other languages, such as Japanese.