6533b7d6fe1ef96bd12667f4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Coronary Revascularization and Long-Term Survivorship in Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Ana Gabaldon-perezVictor Marcos-garcesJose Gavara DoñateCesar Rios-navarroGema MiñanaAntoni Bayés-genísOliver HusserJuan SanchisJulio NúñezFrancisco J ChorroVicente BodiUniversitat Autònoma De Barcelona. Departament De Medicina

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyAcute coronary syndromeIschemic heart diseasemedicine.medical_treatmentstress cardiac magnetic resonancelcsh:MedicineChronic coronary syndromeReviewischemiaDisease030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyRevascularizationCoronary artery diseaseCoronary artery disease03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineIschemiaInternal medicineMedicine030212 general & internal medicineCause of deathStress cardiac magnetic resonancechronic coronary syndromebusiness.industryMortality ratelcsh:RPercutaneous coronary interventionGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseaseischemic heart diseaseMyocardial revascularizationmyocardial revascularizationConventional PCICardiologybusinesscoronary artery disease

description

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) persists as the leading cause of death in the Western world. In recent decades, great headway has been made in reducing mortality due to IHD, based around secondary prevention. The advent of coronary revascularization techniques, first coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in the 1960s and then percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the 1970s, has represented one of the major breakthroughs in medicine during the last century. The benefit provided by these techniques, especially PCI, has been crucial in lowering mortality rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in the setting where IHD is most prevalent, namely chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), the increase in life expectancy provided by coronary revascularization is controversial. Over more than 40 years, several clinical trials have been carried out comparing optimal medical treatment (OMT) alone with a strategy of routine coronary revascularization on top of OMT. Beyond a certain degree of symptomatic improvement and lower incidence of minor events, routine invasive management has not demonstrated a convincing effect in terms of reducing mortality in CCS. Based on the accumulated evidence more than half a century after the first revascularization procedures were used, invasive management should be considered in those patients with uncontrolled symptoms despite OMT or high-risk features related to left ventricular function, coronary anatomy, or functional assessment, taking into account the patient expectations and preferences.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040610