6533b7d6fe1ef96bd1266e1a
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Dynamic Integration of Decision Committees
Seppo PuuronenAlexey Tsymbalsubject
Majority ruleBoosting (machine learning)business.industryComputer sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectMachine learningcomputer.software_genreKnowledge acquisitionComputingMethodologies_PATTERNRECOGNITIONVotingInformation systemArtificial intelligenceAdaBoostbusinessClassifier (UML)computerInformation integrationmedia_commondescription
Decision committee learning has demonstrated outstanding success in reducing classification error with an ensemble of classifiers. In a way a decision committee is a classifier formed upon an ensemble of subsidiary classifiers. Voting, which is commonly used to produce the final decision of committees has, however, a shortcoming. It is unable to take into account local expertise. When a new instance is difficult to classify, then it easily happens that only the minority of the classifiers will succeed, and the majority voting will quite probably result in a wrong classification. We suggest that dynamic integration of classifiers is used instead of majority voting in decision committees. Our method is based on the assumption that each classifier is best inside certain subareas of the whole domain. In this paper, the proposed dynamic integration is evaluated in combination with the well-known decision committee approaches AdaBoost and Bagging. The comparison results show that both boosting and bagging produce often significantly higher accuracy with the dynamic integration than with voting.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2000-01-01 |