6533b7d6fe1ef96bd12670d8

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The effectiveness of peer-support for people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Samantha PageRigmor C. BergAnita ØGård-repål

subject

MaleRNA virusesEpidemiologyHIV InfectionsPeer supportPathology and Laboratory MedicineMathematical and Statistical TechniquesImmunodeficiency VirusesHealth careMedicine and Health SciencesPublic and Occupational HealthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMultidisciplinaryVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin sosialmedisin: 801StatisticsQRHIV diagnosis and managementMetaanalysisResearch AssessmentVaccination and ImmunizationPeer reviewTreatment OutcomeAnti-Retroviral AgentsVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800Medical MicrobiologyMeta-analysisViral PathogensVirusesPhysical SciencesMedicineFemalePathogensResearch Articlemedicine.medical_specialtyDrug Research and DevelopmentSystematic ReviewsScienceImmunologyMEDLINEAntiretroviral TherapyResearch and Analysis MethodsMicrobiologyPeer GroupQuality of life (healthcare)Antiviral TherapyRetrovirusesMental Health and PsychiatrymedicineHumansClinical TrialsStatistical MethodsMicrobial PathogensPharmacologybusiness.industryLentivirusOrganismsSocial SupportBiology and Life SciencesHIVOdds ratioRandomized Controlled TrialsDiagnostic medicineFamily medicineRelative riskMedical Risk FactorsHIV-1Preventive MedicineClinical MedicineVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Community medicine Social medicine: 801businessMathematics

description

Background The practice of involving people living with HIV in the development and provision of healthcare has gained increasing traction. Peer-support for people living with HIV is assistance and encouragement by an individual considered equal, in taking an active role in self-management of their chronic health condition. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of peer-support for people living with HIV. Methods We conducted a systematic review in accordance with international guidelines. Following systematic searches of eight databases until May 2020, two reviewers performed independent screening of studies according to preset inclusion criteria. We conducted risk of bias assessments and meta-analyses of the available evidence in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The certainty of the evidence for each primary outcome was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Results After screening 219 full texts we included 20 RCTs comprising 7605 participants at baseline from nine different countries. The studies generally had low risk of bias. Main outcomes with high certainty of evidence showed modest, but superior retention in care (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.07; Confidence Interval [CI] 95% 1.02–1.12 at 12 months follow-up), antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (RR 1.06; CI 95% 1.01–1.10 at 3 months follow-up), and viral suppression (Odds Ratio up to 6.24; CI 95% 1.28–30.5 at 6 months follow-up) for peer-support participants. The results showed that the current state of evidence for most other main outcomes (ART initiation, CD4 cell count, quality of life, mental health) was promising, but too uncertain for firm conclusions. Conclusions Overall, peer-support with routine medical care is superior to routine clinic follow-up in improving outcomes for people living with HIV. It is a feasible and effective approach for linking and retaining people living with HIV to HIV care, which can help shoulder existing services. Trial registration CRD42020173433.

10.1371/journal.pone.0252623https://hdl.handle.net/10037/21583