6533b7d7fe1ef96bd1267bb2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

How Journalists Think about Media Effects—And Why We Should Care

Ralf HohlfeldPhilipp Müller

subject

CommunicationField (Bourdieu)05 social sciencesMedia studiesbepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Communication050801 communication & media studiesContent creation0506 political science0508 media and communicationsbepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Communication|Journalism Studiesbepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences050602 political science & public administrationJournalismSocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|CommunicationSocArXiv|Social and Behavioral SciencesSociologyContent productionSocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Communication|Journalism Studies

description

Research suggests that journalists’ beliefs about media effects are influenced by unsystematically gathered knowledge and subjective-intuitive judgments. However, it has also been shown that these presumptions must be considered important factors for the formation of journalistic coverage. Against this background, this article synthesizes existing research on dimensions, determinants, and consequences of journalists’ presumptions of media effects. The resulting framework offers researchers in the field of journalistic content production a comprehensive overview of the possible role that presumptions of media effects could play for journalistic content creation. In a second step, we summarize the implications that the current state of research points at. We discuss why journalism scholars should integrate presumed media effects into their research agendas and what communication researchers as well as journalists themselves could do to promote more realistic beliefs about media effects among journalists.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2017.1286343