6533b7d7fe1ef96bd1268264
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A solution to the human paradox: fundamental ontogenies and heterochronies
Jean ChalineA. Dambricourt MalasséFrançoise Magniez-janninDidier MarchandM. J. Deshayessubject
biologyOntogenyZoologySimianbiology.organism_classificationSkullmedicine.anatomical_structureAustralopithecusHomo sapiensAnthropologybiology.animalmedicinePrimateBipedalismdescription
Solving the human paradox means explaining how a genetic difference of a mere 1% can be consistent with 5 million years of anatomical transformation from great apes to present-dayHomo sapiens. The solution proposed here is that of the internal history of ontogenetic change. A concept of “fundamental ontogeny” is developed and deduced from comparison between living and fossil primates. The fossil human lineage can be summarized into five fundamental ontogenies corresponding to successive skull plans (bauplans) resulting from five major phases of craniofacial contraction: prosimians (adapiforms), monkey apes (propliopithecidae), great apes (dryopithecidae), australopithecines andHomo. The morphological areas defined by these skull plans include more-or-less numerous species. This concept leads to renewed debate about (i) the relationship between speciation and bauplans, and (ii) the mechanisms involved in the successive steps of cranio-facial contraction and the correlated morphological changes. It is suggested that, from great apes to modern man, numerous heterochronies (hypermorphosis, hypomorphosis and post-displacements) have occurred during ontogeny, allowing the acquisition of permanent bipedalism inAustralopithecus andHomo, the increased cranial capacity of primitive forms ofHomo, and the disappearance of simian characters associated with renewed increase in cranial capacity inH. sapiens.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
1999-10-01 | Human Evolution |