0000000000296966

AUTHOR

A. Dambricourt Malassé

showing 3 related works from this author

A solution to the human paradox: fundamental ontogenies and heterochronies

1999

Solving the human paradox means explaining how a genetic difference of a mere 1% can be consistent with 5 million years of anatomical transformation from great apes to present-dayHomo sapiens. The solution proposed here is that of the internal history of ontogenetic change. A concept of “fundamental ontogeny” is developed and deduced from comparison between living and fossil primates. The fossil human lineage can be summarized into five fundamental ontogenies corresponding to successive skull plans (bauplans) resulting from five major phases of craniofacial contraction: prosimians (adapiforms), monkey apes (propliopithecidae), great apes (dryopithecidae), australopithecines andHomo. The mor…

biologyOntogenyZoologySimianbiology.organism_classificationSkullmedicine.anatomical_structureAustralopithecusHomo sapiensAnthropologybiology.animalmedicinePrimateBipedalismHuman Evolution
researchProduct

Chromosomes and the origins of apes and australopithecins

1996

Comparison of molecular data suggests that the higher apes (Gorilla, Pan) and humankind (Homo) are closely related and that they diverged from the common ancestor through two speciation events situated very closely together in time. Examination of the chromosomal formulas of the living species reveals a paradox in the distribution of mutated chromosomes which can only be resolved by a model of trichotomic diversification. This new model of divergence from the common ancestor is characterized by the transition from (1) a monotypic phase to (2) a polytypic phase of three sub-species — pre-gorilla, pre-chimpanzee and preaustralopithecine. The quadruped ancestors ofAustralopithecus appear to ha…

Chimpanzee–human last common ancestorbiologyAustralopithecusPhylogenesisAnthropologybiology.animalZoologyContext (language use)AustralopithecineGorillaSubspeciesbiology.organism_classificationAncestorHuman Evolution
researchProduct

Were climatic changes a driving force in hominid evolution?

2000

International audience; A comparison of externalist and internalist approaches in hominid evolution shows that the externalist approach, with its claim that climate was responsible for the appearance of bipedalism and hominization, now seems to be ruled out by the biological, palaeogeographical, palaeontological and palaeoclimatic data on which it was based. Biological data support the embryonic origin of cranio-facial contraction, which determined the increase in cranial capacity and the shift in the position of the foramen magnum implying bipedalism. In the internalist approach, developmental biology appears as the driving force of hominid evolution, although climate exerts a significant …

0106 biological sciencesexternalist approach[SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and PrehistoryOcean EngineeringSubspeciesBiology010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciences03 medical and health sciences[SDV.BID.EVO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]Bipedalism030304 developmental biologyWater Science and TechnologyAncestorEcological niche0303 health sciences[SHS.ARCHEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and PrehistoryEcologyHominization[SDV.BID.EVO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]Geologyhominid evolutionbiology.organism_classification[ SDV.BID.EVO ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]Homo sapiens[ SHS.ARCHEO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistoryinternalist approachHomo erectus
researchProduct