6533b837fe1ef96bd12a29d2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Were climatic changes a driving force in hominid evolution?

Bruno DavidA. DurandA. Dambricourt MalasséFrançoise Magniez-janninJean ChalineDidier Marchand

subject

0106 biological sciencesexternalist approach[SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and PrehistoryOcean EngineeringSubspeciesBiology010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciences03 medical and health sciences[SDV.BID.EVO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]Bipedalism030304 developmental biologyWater Science and TechnologyAncestorEcological niche0303 health sciences[SHS.ARCHEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and PrehistoryEcologyHominization[SDV.BID.EVO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]Geologyhominid evolutionbiology.organism_classification[ SDV.BID.EVO ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]Homo sapiens[ SHS.ARCHEO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistoryinternalist approachHomo erectus

description

International audience; A comparison of externalist and internalist approaches in hominid evolution shows that the externalist approach, with its claim that climate was responsible for the appearance of bipedalism and hominization, now seems to be ruled out by the biological, palaeogeographical, palaeontological and palaeoclimatic data on which it was based. Biological data support the embryonic origin of cranio-facial contraction, which determined the increase in cranial capacity and the shift in the position of the foramen magnum implying bipedalism. In the internalist approach, developmental biology appears as the driving force of hominid evolution, although climate exerts a significant influence and was involved in the following ways: (1) in the prior establishment of ecological niches that allowed the common ancestor to become differentiated into three subspecies; (2) by dividing up the area of distribution of species, resulting in the present-day subspecies of gorillas and chimpanzees; (3) by facilitating relative fluctuations of the geographical areas of distribution of the various species, particularly the spread of australopithecines across the African savanna from north (Chad, Ethiopia) to south (South Africa); (4) by determining adaptive geographical diferentiations among Homo erectus and Homo sapiens (pigmentation, haemoglobin, etc.).

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00428700/document