6533b7d7fe1ef96bd126837f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Strong and sustained effector function of memory- versus naïve-derived T cells upon T-cell receptor RNA transfer: Implications for cellular therapy

Simone ThomasKatrin BesoldBodo PlachterJan DörrieSebastian KlobuchNiels SchaftMatthias TheobaldWolfgang Herr

subject

Interleukin 21ZAP70ImmunologyImmunologyCancer researchImmunology and AllergyCD28Cytotoxic T cellIL-2 receptorStreptamerBiologyNatural killer T cellAntigen-presenting cell

description

Current protocols used to select CMV-specific T cells for adoptive immunotherapy focus on virus-specific memory T cells from seropositive donors. However, this strategy is not feasible in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) from CMV-seronegative donors. Here, we redirected T cells of CMV-seronegative donors with a human genetically engineered TCR recognizing an HLA-A*0201-binding peptide epitope of CMVpp65. To facilitate clinical translation of this approach, we used a non-viral expression system based on in vitro transcribed RNA and electroporation. Although memory and naive-derived T-cell subsets were both efficiently transfected by TCR-RNA, memory-derived T cells showed much stronger levels of HLA-A*0201-restricted cytolytic activity to CMV-infected fibroblasts and maintained acquired function for 5–10 days. In addition to redirection of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, TCR-RNA transfection was capable of redirecting CD4+ T cells into potent Ag-specific Th cells that efficiently triggered maturation of DCs. Our data suggest that memory rather than naive-derived T cells are the preferred subset for transient TCR expression by RNA electroporation, providing more efficient and sustained virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell function. CMV TCR-RNA may represent a suitable therapeutic ‘off-the-shelf’ reagent to be used in severe CMV infections of HSCT patients when endogenous CMV-specific T-cell immunity is insufficient.

https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201242666