6533b7d7fe1ef96bd126862d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Changing forest stakeholders’ perception of ecosystem services with linguistic nudging

Maiju PeuraDaniel Burgas RieraArho ToikkaJanne HukkinenMikko MönkkönenKaroliina IsoahoNina Janasik-honkela

subject

choice architectureGeography Planning and Developmentforest management0211 other engineering and technologiesPsychological interventionCognitive dissonance02 engineering and technologyDECISION-MAKING010501 environmental sciences01 natural sciencesEcosystem servicesvaikuttaminenCognitive dissonancemedia_commonGlobal and Planetary ChangeForest managementEcologymetsänkäsittelyEnvironmental resource management021107 urban & regional planningsustainabilityPOLICYAgricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)LinguisticsChoice architectureekosysteemipalvelutmetsäpolitiikkaSustainabilitykognitiivinen dissonanssiBEHAVIORnudgemedia_common.quotation_subjectForest managementManagement Monitoring Policy and Lawkestävä metsätalousmetsätalousInformational interventionPerceptionChoice architectureMANAGEMENT1172 Environmental sciences0105 earth and related environmental sciencesNature and Landscape ConservationNudgecognitive dissonancebusiness.industry15. Life on landinformational intervention13. Climate actionSustainable managementSustainabilityBusinessOWNERS

description

This paper explores whether the perceptions of forest owners and professionals could be nudged towards more sustainable management practices by adjusting a policy text's metaphorical content. Recent research has demonstrated a link between information interventions and preference change, but there is a need to further explore individuals' reactions to information on forest-based ecosystem services and to link these to the design of policy instruments. We contribute to narrowing this gap by nudging the content of a policy text comparing rotation forest management (RFM) and continuous cover forestry (CCF), and exposing it to forest stakeholders. The research is carried out in Finland, the so-called 'forest nation' of Europe, whose economy and culture is closely tied to forests. The results highlight a deep-rooted opinion divide between Finnish forest owners and professionals: the professionals reacted significantly more negatively towards policy text emphasising continuous cover practice than forest owners. Our results support the use of linguistic nudging as a complement to other policy instruments, but they also highlight the challenges of using one-fits-all approaches to make policies more palatable. In our study, the stakeholders' different reaction to nudge was also explained by their age, and type and degree of prior knowledge on forest management. Peer reviewed

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101028