6533b7d7fe1ef96bd126906e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Are transposition effects specific to letters?

Javier Garcı A-orzaManuel PereaSamara Muñoz

subject

VocabularyVisual perceptionUniversitiesPhysiologySpeech recognitionmedia_common.quotation_subjectExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyVocabularyDiscrimination PsychologicalPhysiology (medical)Reaction TimeHumansAttentionStudentsGeneral Psychologymedia_commonAnalysis of VarianceVerbal BehaviorGeneral MedicineKanaLinguisticsNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPattern Recognition VisualVisual PerceptionPsychologyPriming (psychology)Photic StimulationCoding (social sciences)

description

Recent research has consistently shown that pseudowords created by transposing two letters are perceptually similar to their corresponding base words (e.g., jugde–judge). In the framework of the overlap model (Gomez, Ratcliff, & Perea, 2008), this effect is due to a noisy process in the localization of the “objects” (e.g., letters, kana syllables). In the present study, we examine whether this effect is specific to letter strings or whether it also occurs with other “objects” (namely, digits, symbols, and pseudoletters). To that end, we conducted a series of five masked priming experiments using the same–different task. Results showed robust effects of transposition for all objects, except for pseudoletters. This is consistent with the view that locations of familiar objects (i.e., letters, numbers, and symbols) can be best understood as distributions along a dimension rather than as precise points.

10.1080/17470210903474278https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20119880