6533b7d8fe1ef96bd12696e6
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a pilot study
Daniel RothamelKatja SchwenzerThomas GeorgFrank SchwarzAnton SculeanJürgen C. Beckersubject
medicine.medical_specialtyPeri-implantitisbusiness.industrymedicine.drug_classmedicine.medical_treatmentChlorhexidineBleeding on probingDentistrySurgerylaw.inventionRandomized controlled trialAntisepticlawDebridement (dental)medicineOral Surgerymedicine.symptombusinessGingival recessionEr:YAG lasermedicine.drugdescription
The aim of this controlled, parallel design clinical study was to compare the effectiveness of an Er:YAG laser (ERL) to that of mechanical debridement using plastic curettes and antiseptic therapy for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Twenty patients with moderate to advanced peri-implantitis lesions were randomly treated with either (1) an ERL using a cone-shaped glass fiber tip at an energy setting of 100 mJ/pulse and 10 pps (ERL), or (2) mechanical debridement using plastic curettes and antiseptic therapy with chlorhexidine digluconate (0.2%) (C). The following clinical parameters were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months after treatment by one blinded and calibrated examiner: Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), gingival recession (GR) and clinical attachment level (CAL). At the baseline examination, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the investigated parameters. Mean value of BOP decreased in the ERL group from 83% at baseline to 31% after 6 months (P 0.05). Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that (i) at 6 months following treatment both therapies led to significant improvements of the investigated clinical parameters, and (ii) ERL resulted in a statistically significant higher reduction of BOP than C.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2004-07-14 | Clinical Oral Implants Research |