6533b7d8fe1ef96bd1269894

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Adaptation and validation of the Spanish self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III).

D Hervás-marínF Torralba-colladosM Giner-pascualMarta Aguilar-rodríguezL Peña-pachésC Grao-castellote

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyActivities of daily livingCross-sectional studyCultureAnal CanalPilot ProjectsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationUrethraSurveys and QuestionnairesActivities of Daily LivingMedicineHumansSelf reportSpinal cord injurySpinal Cord InjuriesLanguageMeasure (data warehouse)business.industryRespirationGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseSpinal cordConfidence intervalSelf Caremedicine.anatomical_structureConcordance correlation coefficientCross-Sectional StudiesNeurologySpainChronic DiseasePhysical therapyFemaleNeurology (clinical)Self Reportbusiness

description

Study design: This is a cross-sectional validation study. Objective: The objective of this study was to adapt and validate a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) for the Spanish population. Methods: A cross-cultural adaptation of the self-report version of the SCIM III for the Spanish population was performed on the basis of international guidelines. A total of 100 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) were recruited. A team of healthcare professionals administered the SCIM III by observation. In addition, the patients completed the Spanish self-report version (eSCIM-SR). Data from both questionnaires were analysed jointly. Results: A high correlation was observed between SCIM III and eSCIM-SR. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient for the global score was 0.998 (95% confidence interval: 0.997, 0.998), and the subscale scores were 0.988 (0.982, 0.992) for self-care, 0.992 (0.988, 0.995) for respiration and sphincter management and 0.997 (0.995, 0.998) for Mobility. Bland-Altman plots showed a small bias of -0.32 (95% limits of agreement: -3.01, 2.37). The estimated bias was low in all three domains, with values of -0.22 (-2.12, 1.68), -0.1 (-2.02, 1.82) and -0.03 (-1.69, 1.63) for the self-care, respiration and sphincter management and mobility subscales, respectively. Conclusion: Our study validates the eSCIM-SR as a tool for the functional assessment of patients with SCI, principally in the outpatient setting.

http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25510190