6533b7d8fe1ef96bd126a128

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking

Xuping LiXuping LiWalter Bisang

subject

CombinatoricsLinguistics and LanguageDefinitenessHead (linguistics)Classifier (linguistics)UniquenessPredicative expressionRaising (linguistics)Language and LinguisticsMathematicsWord orderInterpretation (model theory)

description

Abstract This article examines the distribution and interpretation of the bare classifier phrase [Cl+N] in three Sinitic languages of Mandarin, Wu and Cantonese. We show that [Cl+N] can be interpreted as definite or indefinite depending on pragmatic factors related to information structure and word order. Syntactically, we claim that indefinite [Cl+N] has the maximal projection of ClP and that definite [Cl+N] is a DP, where the D head is filled by the classifier via Cl-to-D raising. Semantically, we claim that indefinite [Cl+N] is predicative, denoting sets of atomic entities and that definite [Cl+N] is derived from indefinite [Cl+N] by lifting it from predicates to Generalized Quantifiers. We further claim that the definiteness expressed by [Cl+N] is characterized by the pragmatic notion of ‘familiarity/identifiability’ as it can be linked to information structure and not ‘uniqueness’. Definite classifiers differ from the English definite article ‘the’ and they are not full-fledged grammaticalized definiteness markers.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.002