6533b7d8fe1ef96bd126a2ef
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Assessing molecular subtypes of gastric cancer: microsatellite unstable and Epstein-Barr virus subtypes. Methods for detection and clinical and pathological implications.
Marta LlorcaMarisol HuertaLara NavarroNoelia TarazonaAndrés CervantesSamuel NavarroGema NietoTania Fleitas-kanonnikoffDesamparados RodaRegina MengualValentina GambardellaGloria RibasSusana RosellóCarolina Martínez-ciarpagliniCristina Mongortsubject
OncologyCancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialtyConcordancemedicine.disease_causelcsh:RC254-282Internal medicinemedicine1506PathologicalOriginal Researchepstein-barr virusbusiness.industrygastric cancerCancerMicrosatellite instabilitylcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensmedicine.diseaseEpstein–Barr virusImmune checkpointdigestive system diseasesOncologyImmunohistochemistryMicrosatellitemicrosatellite instabilitybusinessdescription
Background The molecular classification of gastric cancer recognises two subtypes prone to immune checkpoint blockade: the microsatellite unstable and the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related tumours. We aim to assess the concordance between immunohistochemistry and PCR for microsatellite status evaluation, and explore the value of microsatellite instability (MSI) and EBV as predictive survival factors. Material and methods We collected 246 consecutively diagnosed gastric cancer cases in all stages and evaluated the microsatellite status using immunohistochemistry for mismatched repair (MMR) proteins and PCR. EBV expression was studied through in situ hybridisation. Results Forty-five (18%) cases presented MSI and 13 (6%) were positive for EBV. MSI was associated with female sex, older age, distal location and distal non-diffuse type of the modified Lauren classification. EBV expression was most frequent in proximal location and proximal non-diffuse type. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of immunohistochemistry for the microsatellite study were 91%, 98%, 91% and 98%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, MSI was an independent predictor of favourable tumour-specific survival (TSS) in stages I–III (MSI: HR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.95, p=0.04). Conclusions The MSI status and the EBV expression should be incorporated in routine pathological report for two reasons. First, MSI defines a different pathological entity with a better outcome. Second, MSI and EBV may be useful biomarkers to identify patients who will respond to immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors. For this purpose, immunohistochemical study for MMR proteins and in situ hybridisation study for EBV evaluation are feasible and cost-effective methods.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-11-09 | ESMO open |