6533b7d9fe1ef96bd126cda0

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Olfactory function in children assessed with psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques

Julia NikolausThomas HummelMichael KnechtMoustafa BensafiDavid G. LaingBenoist Schaal

subject

Olfactory systemMalemedicine.medical_specialtymedia_common.quotation_subjectOlfactionAudiologyDevelopmental psychology03 medical and health sciencesBehavioral Neuroscience[SCCO]Cognitive science0302 clinical medicineDiscrimination PsychologicalPerceptionPsychophysicsmedicinePsychophysicsReaction TimeHumans030223 otorhinolaryngologyChildEvoked PotentialsComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSmedia_commonAnalysis of Variance[SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/NeuroscienceAge FactorsOdor identificationOlfactory PathwaysSmellElectrophysiologyOdorChild PreschoolOdorants[ SCCO.NEUR ] Cognitive science/NeuroscienceFemaleAnalysis of variancePsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

International audience; The olfactory information processing abilities of children undergo changes during early life. The aims of the present study were to describe these changes and to probe for their electrophysiological correlates. These aims were investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responses of 146 subjects (3-12 years) were tested with psychophysical tools. Approximately 2/3 of the subjects completed the olfactory tests ("Sniffin' Sticks"). In Experiment 2, 12 additional subjects (3-10 years) were tested with electrophysiological tools. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in response to olfactory stimulation with H(2)S. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that data from the group of 3-5-year olds were very unreliable, with 44% of incomplete measures rendering the tests unsuitable for routine use with 3-5-year olds. From an age of 6 years on the results suggested that the development of olfactory function was well advanced with a significant increase found only for odor identification, but not for odor thresholds, or odor discrimination. Results from Experiment 2 indicated an increase of the P2 latency with age, although the small sample size has to be considered in the interpretation of these data. While more research is needed, these results may be interpreted such that children attach more meaning to odorous stimuli with age.

10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.040https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02343738