6533b7dafe1ef96bd126f5a2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Sex roles and the evolution of parental care specialization

Adam JonesJonathan M. HenshawJonathan M. HenshawLutz Fromhage

subject

Male0106 biological sciencesEvolutionparental investmentsukupuolierotevoluutioyksiavioisuusBiology010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biologymating competitionSexual Behavior Animal03 medical and health sciencesmonogamySpecialization (functional)sex-role reversalAnimalssexual selectionSex RatioMatingParental investmentPhylogeny030304 developmental biologyGeneral Environmental ScienceSex Characteristics0303 health sciencesPhylogenetic inertiaParentingGeneral Immunology and MicrobiologylisääntymiskäyttäytyminenGeneral MedicineMating systemdivision of labourAnisogamysukupuolivalintaEvolutionary biologySexual selectionFemaleGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesPaternal care

description

Males and females are defined by the relative size of their gametes (anisogamy), but secondary sexual dimorphism in fertilization, parental investment and mating competition is widespread and often remarkably stable over evolutionary timescales. Recent theory has clarified the causal connections between anisogamy and the most prevalent differences between the sexes, but deviations from these patterns remain poorly understood. Here, we study how sex differences in parental investment and mating competition coevolve with parental care specialization. Parental investment often consists of two or more distinct activities (e.g. provisioning and defence) and parents may care more efficiently by specializing in a subset of these activities. Our model predicts that efficient care specialization broadens the conditions under which biparental investment can evolve in lineages that historically had uniparental care. Major transitions in sex roles (e.g. from female-biased care with strong male mating competition to male-biased care with strong female competition) can arise following ecologically induced changes in the costs or benefits of different care types, or in the sex ratio at maturation. Our model provides a clear evolutionary mechanism for sex-role transitions, but also predicts that such transitions should be rare. It consequently contributes towards explaining widespread phylogenetic inertia in parenting and mating systems.

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201911184916