6533b7dbfe1ef96bd127006e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effect of Divalent Cations on the Contractile Response of Rat Aorta to Depolarization before and after Nifedipine Treatment

M.a. NogueraM. ElorriagaP. D’oconMaria Dolores IvorraS. Chuliá

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyNifedipineCations DivalentAorta ThoracicMuscle Smooth VascularPotassium ChlorideDivalentTonic (physiology)NifedipineInternal medicinemedicine.arterymedicineAnimalsRats WistarPharmacologychemistry.chemical_classificationAnalysis of VarianceAortaChemistryContractile responseDepolarizationGeneral MedicineCalcium Channel BlockersRatsEndocrinologyKrebs solutionIntracellularMuscle Contractionmedicine.drug

description

The influence of the divalent cations, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Ba2+, on the contractile response of the rat aorta to KCl and on the recovery of this response after nifedipine treatment was analyzed. KCl (80 mmol/l) promoted a two-phase (phasic and tonic) contractile response in Krebs solution but, as expected, no contractile response in Ca(2+)-free medium. In Mg(2+)-free medium, the phasic response to KCl was unaffected but the tonic one decreased slowly, suggesting that a long incubation time in the absence of Mg2+ (65 min) promotes a loss of or a change in the intracellular distribution of this ion that modifies Ca2+ entry through L channels or Ca2+ handling. Ba2+ (1.8 mmol/l) contracted the rat aorta in the absence or presence of Ca2+ but, when Ca2+ was not present, Ba2+ modified the contractile process so that a new addition of KCl did not reproduce the contractile response. After nifedipine treatment, no phasic response to KCl was observed and only a slow response appeared that increased as long as the KCl was present (45 min). After washing, KCl induced a phasic response similar to the standard response, but a smaller tonic one. Divalent cations accelerated the recovery of the channels involved in the tonic contraction. However, the recovery of the Ca2+ channels related to the phasic contraction was independent of divalent cations.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000139420