6533b7dbfe1ef96bd1270146
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comparison of four mass analyzers for determining carbosulfan and its metabolites in citrus by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
Jordi MañesAmbrose FureyCarla SolerKevin J. JamesBrett HamiltonYolanda Picosubject
Spectrometry Mass Electrospray IonizationChromatographyOrganic ChemistryAnalytical chemistryReproducibility of ResultsButylaminesMass spectrometrySensitivity and SpecificityAnalytical ChemistryTriple quadrupole mass spectrometerDibutylamineCarbofuranchemistry.chemical_compoundchemistryLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometryQuadrupoleCarbosulfanCarbamatesQuadrupole ion trapChromatography High Pressure LiquidSpectroscopyCitrus sinensisdescription
Four liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) systems, equipped with single quadrupole, triple quadrupole (QqQ), quadrupole ion trap (QIT) and quadrupole time-of-flight (QqTOF) mass analyzers, were evaluated for the analysis of carbosulfan and its main transformation products. The comparison of quantitative aspects (sensitivity, precision and accuracy) was emphasized. Results showed that the triple quadrupole instrument reaches at least 20-fold higher sensitivity (LOD from 0.04 to 0.4 microg kg(-1)) compared to the single quadrupole (4-70 microg kg(-1)), the QIT (4-25 microg kg(-1)) and the QqTOF (4-23 microg kg(-1)) instruments. Recoveries were over 70% for all the analytes, except dibutylamine and 7-phenolcarbofuran. Repeatabilities (within-day) were slightly better by the single quadrupole (5-10%) and the QqQ (5-9%) than by the QIT (12-16%) and the QqTOF (9-16%). Both the QqTOF and QIT offer a linear dynamic range of two orders of magnitude whereas the single quadrupole and QqQ of, at least, three orders of magnitude. The method was applied to analyze carbosulfan field-treated orange samples, in which carbosulfan, carbofuran, 3-hydroxycarbofuran, and dibutylamine were found. As an example, the mean carbosulfan concentration was 20 +/- 0.6 microg kg(-1) measured by the QqQ, 22 +/- 1.2 microg kg(-1) by the single quadrupole, 25 +/- 2.8 microg kg(-1) by the QIT, and 20 +/- 1.8 microg kg(-1) by the QqTOF. Although the QqQ is more sensitive and precise, the mean values obtained by the four instruments are acceptable and comparable. The potential of each technique for the verification of the identity of residues detected in oranges is discussed using the concept of identification points.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2006-06-15 | Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry |