6533b7dcfe1ef96bd1271708

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effects of four carbamate compounds on antioxidant parameters

María José RuizGuillermina FontElisa MaranPierluigi BarbieriM. Fernández

subject

InsecticidesCarbamateAntioxidantAldicarbHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesismedicine.medical_treatmentGlutathione reductaseCHO CellsPropoxurmedicine.disease_causeAntioxidantschemistry.chemical_compoundCricetulusCricetinaemedicineAnimalschemistry.chemical_classificationGlutathione PeroxidaseGlutathione DisulfideGlutathione peroxidasePublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthGeneral MedicineGlutathionePropoxurGlutathionePollutionOxidative StressGlutathione ReductasechemistryBiochemistryEnzyme InductionAldicarbOxidative stress

description

Abstract The effect of four carbamates, aldicarb and its metabolites (aldicarb sulfone and aldicarb sulfoxide) and propoxur on glutathione content and the activity of the enzymes involved in the sulfur-redox cycle in the mammalian cellular model CHO-K1 cells after 24-h exposure were determined. Carbamate exposure resulted in a depletion of intracellular reduced glutathione (GSH) content, no change was observed in oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and a decrease in GSH/GSSG ratio was detected. After carbamates exposition a GSH/GSSG decreases in ranged from 12.44% to 21.35% of control was observed. Depletion of GSH levels was accompanied by the induction of glutathione reductase (GR) after 24 h exposure with each of the four carbamates to CHO-K1 cells. After aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb sulfoxide, and propoxur exposure, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity increased in CHO-K1 cells by 198%, 32%, and 228% of control, respectively. After aldicarb sulfone and propoxur exposure, glutathione transferase (GST) activities increased by 49% and 230% of control, respectively. Due to the role played by GSH in preventing cytotoxicity via free-radical scavenging, results obtained suggest that high concentrations of aldicarb sulfone and propoxur closely resembling oxidative stress in CHO-K1 cells.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.01.018