6533b7dcfe1ef96bd1271ef5
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Complications in the use of the mandibular body, ramus and symphysis as donor sites in bone graft surgery: a systematic review
Carlos Cobo-vázquezMarta Monteserín-matesanzJuan López-quilesDavid Reiningersubject
medicine.medical_specialtyMandibular symphysisSymphysisDentistryOdontologíaMandibleReviewBone resorption03 medical and health sciencesPostoperative Complications0302 clinical medicineMandibular bodystomatognathic systemmedicineHumansIn patientGeneral DentistryAnterior teethBone Transplantationbusiness.industryMandible030206 dentistry:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Ciencias de la saludSurgerystomatognathic diseasesmedicine.anatomical_structureOtorhinolaryngologyBone transplantation030220 oncology & carcinogenesisUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASSurgeryOral Surgerybusinessdescription
Background To develop a systematic review by assessing and comparing the different complications that occurs in bone graft surgery using the mandibular body, ramus and symphysis as donor sites. Material and Methods In order to respond to the following question, a systematic review was developed: does the use of intraoral mandibular body and ramus as donor sites in bone graft surgery, produce fewer and less severe complications in comparison to the use of the mandibular symphysis in patients that present bone resorption that needs augmentation using autologous grafts? The review was carried out between January 1990 and 2015, during which only clinical essays with a minimum follow-up period of six months were included. Results The initial search yielded a total of 2912 articles, of which 6 were finally selected. In total, 259 graft surgeries were performed; 118 using the mandibular body and ramus as donor sites, and 141, the symphysis. The most frequent complications that arose when using the mandibular symphysis were temporary sensory alterations in the anterior teeth (33.87%), followed by sensory alterations of the skin and mucosa (18.57%). As for the mandibular body and ramus donor sites, the most frequent complications relate to temporary sensory alterations of the mucosa (8.19%) and to minor postoperative bleeding (6.55%). Conclusions The analyzed results show a higher prevalence and severity of complications when using mandibular symphysis bone grafts, producing more discomfort for the patient. Therefore, it would be advisable to perform further clinical essays due to the lack of studies found. Key words:Alveolar ridge augmentation, autogenous bone, mandibular bone grafts, chin, mandibular symphysis, mandibular ramus.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-07-15 |