6533b7dcfe1ef96bd1272172

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Validation of ThermoHuman automatic thermographic software for assessing foot temperature before and after running

Pedro Pérez-sorianoIrene Jimenez-perezLara Requena-buenoMarina Gil-calvoJose Ignacio Priego-quesada

subject

AdultMale0106 biological sciencesPhysiologyComputer scienceSoftware Validation030310 physiology010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesBiochemistryRunningYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesSoftwareImage Processing Computer-AssistedHumansReliability (statistics)0303 health sciencesFootbusiness.industrySkin temperaturePattern recognitionReplicateSoftware packageThermographyFemaleArtificial intelligenceSkin TemperatureGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesbusinessSoftwareDevelopmental Biology

description

The aim of the study was to evaluate an automatic thermographic software package (ThermoHuman®) for assessing skin temperature on the soles of the feet before and after running and to compare it with two manual definitions of the regions of interest (ROIs). 120 thermal images of the soles of the feet of 30 participants, at two measurement points (before and after running 30 min) and on two measurement days were analyzed. Three different models of thermographic image analyses were used to obtain the mean temperature of 9 ROIs: A) ThermoHuman (automatic definition of ROIs using ThermoHuman® software), B) Manual (manual delimitation of ROIs by proportion criteria), and C) Manual-TH (manual delimitation of ROIs in an attempt to replicate the regions analyzed by ThermoHuman). ThermoHuman resulted in an 86% reduction in time involved compared to manual delimitation. Fourteen of the 120 images (12%) presented some error in one or more of the ROI delimitations. Although the three procedures presented significant differences between them (53% in the comparison between ThermoHuman and Manual, 47% between ThermoHuman and Manual-TH, and 28% between Manual and Manual-TH), all differences had a small effect size (ES 0.2-0.4) or lower (ES  0.2). Bland-Altman plots showed similar 95% limits of agreement between the three procedures before and after running. Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis of the three procedures presented excellent reliability (ICC0.8). In conclusion, ThermoHuman® software was observed to be time-saving for image analysis with excellent reliability. Although results suggest that ThermoHuman® and manual methods are both valid in themselves, combining them is not recommended due to the differences observed between them.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102639