6533b7dcfe1ef96bd1272b20
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The Second APOKASC Catalog: The Empirical Approach
Christian NitschelmDaniel HuberThomas KallingerD. A. García-hernándezD. A. García-hernándezVerne V. SmithMatthew ShetroneSarbani BasuSzabolcs MészárosOlga ZamoraOlga ZamoraJennifer A. JohnsonJoel C. ZinnSaskia HekkerSaskia HekkerJosé G. Fernández-trincadoJosé G. Fernández-trincadoJosé G. Fernández-trincadoTimothy C. BeersKatia CunhaHenrik JönssonJennifer SobeckBenoit MosserVictor Silva AguirreRafael A. GarcíaRafael A. GarcíaDennis StelloYvonne ElsworthYvonne ElsworthJamie TayarEnrico CorsaroWilliam J. ChaplinWilliam J. ChaplinLéo GirardiFred HeartyJon A. HoltzmanSavita MathurSavita MathurSavita MathurPeter M. FrinchaboyGuy S. StringfellowKeivan G. StassunAldo SerenelliMarc H. PinsonneaultThaíse S. RodriguesDeokkeun Ansubject
Stellar populationoscillations (including pulsations) [stars]fundamental parameters [stars]KEPLERFOS: Physical sciencesAstrophysicsAstrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics01 natural sciences0103 physical sciencesOSCILLATIONSAstrophysics::Solar and Stellar AstrophysicsStatistical dispersionstars abundancesFIELD010303 astronomy & astrophysicsRed clumpScalingComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSAstrophysics::Galaxy AstrophysicsSolar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)PhysicsMIXING-LENGTH010308 nuclear & particles physicsAstronomy and AstrophysicsRadiusSurface gravityAGESRED GIANTSStarsStar clusterAstrophysics - Solar and Stellar AstrophysicsSpace and Planetary ScienceOPEN CLUSTERSAstrophysics::Earth and Planetary AstrophysicsBOLOMETRIC CORRECTIONS[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]STARSASTEROSEISMIC MASSdescription
We present a catalog of stellar properties for a large sample of 6676 evolved stars with APOGEE spectroscopic parameters and \textit{Kepler} asteroseismic data analyzed using five independent techniques. Our data includes evolutionary state, surface gravity, mean density, mass, radius, age, and the spectroscopic and asteroseismic measurements used to derive them. We employ a new empirical approach for combining asteroseismic measurements from different methods, calibrating the inferred stellar parameters, and estimating uncertainties. With high statistical significance, we find that asteroseismic parameters inferred from the different pipelines have systematic offsets that are not removed by accounting for differences in their solar reference values. We include theoretically motivated corrections to the large frequency spacing ($\Delta \nu$) scaling relation, and we calibrate the zero point of the frequency of maximum power ($\nu_{\rm max}$) relation to be consistent with masses and radii for members of star clusters. For most targets, the parameters returned by different pipelines are in much better agreement than would be expected from the pipeline-predicted random errors, but 22\% of them had at least one method not return a result and a much larger measurement dispersion. This supports the usage of multiple analysis techniques for asteroseismic stellar population studies. The measured dispersion in mass estimates for fundamental calibrators is consistent with our error model, which yields median random and systematic mass uncertainties for RGB stars of order 4\%. Median random and systematic mass uncertainties are at the 9\% and 8\% level respectively for RC stars.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-12-01 |