6533b7dcfe1ef96bd1272c4e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

An exploratory, prospective, open-label trial of ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% for the treatment of external anogenital warts

M. GormsenMerete HaedersdalC.a. BanzhafSimon Francis ThomsenSimon Francis ThomsenHelle Kiellberg LarsenR.e. Schopf

subject

AdultMaleIngenol Mebutate Gelmedicine.medical_specialtyPopulationPainAntineoplastic AgentsDermatologyYoung Adult030207 dermatology & venereal diseases03 medical and health sciencesBlister0302 clinical medicineQuality of lifeRecurrenceInternal medicineSkin UlcermedicineEdemaHumansEffective treatmentIn patientProspective Studies030212 general & internal medicineAdverse effecteducationAgedAnus Diseaseseducation.field_of_studybusiness.industryMiddle AgedSafety profileTreatment OutcomeInfectious DiseasesCondylomata AcuminataErythemaFemaleDiterpenesGenital Diseases MaleOpen labelbusinessGelsGenital Diseases Female

description

BACKGROUND Anogenital warts (AGW) can cause physical discomfort and decreased quality of life. Recent case reports suggest that ingenol mebutate gel might be an effective treatment of AGW. OBJECTIVE To explore primarily the safety, and secondarily the efficacy of ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% in patients with AGW. METHODS This was an exploratory, open-label, 1-arm trial of ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% administered up to three times to patients with AGW. Safety was assessed by occurrence and severity of local skin reactions (LSRs) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Efficacy was assessed by complete clearance and reduction in AGW count 14 days after last treatment, and recurrence 12 weeks after clearance. RESULTS Of 41 patients enrolled, 40 received treatment and 26 completed the trial. Patients had a median AGW count of 11.0 and AGW duration of 3.0 years at baseline. All patients experienced transient LSRs following treatment with a maximum composite LSR score of 7.5 (on a scale from 0 to 18). A total of 93% of patients reported treatment-related AEs, most frequently pain (85%) and procedural complications (35%) due to smearing of the gel. 78% of patients took mild analgesics for the pain, typically for 1-2 days following treatment. The majority of AEs were of moderate-to-severe intensity. Seventeen of 39 patients (43.6%) had complete clearance 14 days after last treatment, and AGW count was reduced by 90.9%. There was a tendency towards lower clearance rate in patients with longer duration of AGW. Eight of 14 patients (57.1%) had AGW recurrence 12 weeks after clearance. CONCLUSION Ingenol mebutate gel was associated with a high number of AEs and withdrawals due to painful local and adjacent skin reactions. Furthermore, it showed promising efficacy in reducing AGW despite a difficult-to-treat population. Optimization of the formulation is warranted to improve the safety profile of the treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14625