6533b7dcfe1ef96bd1273239
RESEARCH PRODUCT
State effects and the effects of state building: institution building and the formation of state-centred societies
Stein Sundstøl Eriksensubject
021110 strategic defence & security studiesCorporate governancemedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciences0211 other engineering and technologies02 engineering and technologyDevelopmentPublic administrationInstitution buildingState-buildingState formation0506 political scienceState (polity)SovereigntyPolitical sciencePolitical economy050602 political science & public administrationPatrimonialismmedia_commondescription
AbstractThis article discusses the assumptions underlying state-building efforts and the effects of these efforts. It addresses two main questions: why has state building not led to the establishment of effective states? And what are the effects of statebuilding? It is argued that these efforts have been based on an institutionalist model of the state derived from a Weberian framework, and that the basic reason why state building has failed is that the creation of effective states requires the creation of state-centred societies, where both material and symbolic resources are concentrated in the state. This is very difficult to achieve for external actors. But, although state building has not achieved the kinds of effects associated with effective states, it has nevertheless had significant effects. These include, first, accentuating the patrimonialism which has led to state weakness in the first place; second, reductions in national sovereignty as external actors’ substantial influence on policy agendas ...
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-05 | Third World Quarterly |