6533b7ddfe1ef96bd1273659

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Subgroups of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder without Intellectual Disability: A Longitudinal Examination of Executive and Socio-Adaptive Behaviors in Adolescence

Rocio RoselloCarmen BerenguerAna MirandaJose Martinez-ragaSamuele Cortese

subject

Activities of daily livingautism subgroupsArticle03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineSocial skillssocial skillsIntellectual disabilitymedicineautism subgroups; adolescents; executive functioning; social skills; adaptive behavior0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesadolescentsProspective cohort studyAdaptive behaviorbusiness.industry05 social sciencesSocializationRCognitionGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseaseAutism spectrum disorderMedicinebusinessexecutive functioningadaptive behavior030217 neurology & neurosurgery050104 developmental & child psychologyClinical psychology

description

Within the autistic spectrum, there is remarkable variability in the etiology, presentation, and treatment response. This prospective study was designed to identify, through cluster analysis, subgroups of individuals with ASD without intellectual disability (ID) based on the severity of the core symptoms in childhood. The secondary aim was to explore whether these subgroups and a group with typical development (TD) differ in cognitive, adaptive, and social aspects measured in adolescence. The sample at baseline was comprised of 52 children with ASD without ID and 37 children with TD, aged 7–11. Among the ASD group, three clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (40%), ‘high severity’, presented high symptom severity on the DSM-5 criteria and the Social Communication Questionnaire. Cluster 2 (34%) showed ‘moderate severity’ on most of the scores. Cluster 3 (25%) corresponded to ‘low severity’, showing moderate social impairment and low restrictive, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests and activities. At 5-year follow-up, 45 adolescents with ASD without ID and 27 adolescents with TD were assessed. All clusters had significantly more difficulties in EF, ToM, socialization and adaptive behavior compared to TD. Social and adaptive trajectories between the ASD subgroups were relatively different; Cluster 3 showed poorer socialization and daily living skills than the other two subgroups. These findings highlight the importance of fully assessing social, cognitive, and adaptive profiles to develop care plans tailored to specific needs.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102220