6533b7ddfe1ef96bd1273d7f
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Is Finland Different? Quality of Work Among Finnish and European Employees
Armi HartikainenTomi OinasAnttila TimoJouko Nättisubject
Economic growthmedia_common.quotation_subjectSocial sustainabilityContext (language use)vertaileva tutkimusmedia_common.cataloged_instanceQuality (business)job qualityEuropean unionEurooppacomparative studymedia_commonjob satisfactionTechnological changeworking conditionstyöelämän laatutyöolosuhteetArticlesDiscretiontyötyytyväisyysEuropeworking conditiondWorkforceDemographic economicsJob satisfactionBusinessdescription
The issue of the quality of work-life has risen in popularity due to concerns about the economic and social sustainability of European societies. Throughout the continent, global competition, technological change and the intensification of work are common developments which are seen to affect the well-being of the workforce. Nevertheless, European countries differ substantially in terms of job quality. According to earlier research, employees in Sweden and Denmark (and to lesser extent in Finland) report a higher quality of work tasks than elsewhere in Europe. The aim of this paper was to investigate, in a cross-national context using multivariate techniques, whether job quality in Finland really is divergent from that of other Nordic countries and rest of the Europe. Empirical analyses were based on the fourth wave of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) collected in 2005. In this study we used data from the 25 Member States of the European Union and Norway (n=21,196 interviews). Our results support earlier findings that Finland lags behind other Nordic countries in terms of work discretion and the perceptions of being well paid. Instead, Finnish employees were less worried about health issues. When comparing Finland to Scandinavia, we did not find major differences in the amount of highly skilled jobs, insecurity nor the quantity of jobs requiring great effort. We also examined the associations of the dimensions of job quality to job satisfaction. The results indicated that the subjective aspects of job quality were more important determinants of job satisfaction, and that there were only modest differences in the determinants of job satisfaction between country clusters.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010-12-15 |