6533b7ddfe1ef96bd1273fbc

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in emergency medicine journals: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature

Lawrence MbuagbawLehana ThabaneMaria Giulia GalliMaura MarcucciAndrew WorsterGiacomo VeroneseValentina SalvatoriMarta FedeleFederico Germini

subject

Research Reportmedicine.medical_specialtyResearch methodologySystematic surveymedia_common.quotation_subjectAlternative medicineAccident & emergency medicine03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineQuality of reportingProtocolMedicineHumansQuality (business)030212 general & internal medicine1506Abstractmedia_commonRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicProtocol (science)Research ethicsImpact factorbusiness.industryPublicationsConsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials030208 emergency & critical care medicineGeneral Medicinehumanities1691Statistics &research methodsEmergency medicineEmergency MedicineMedline databasebusiness

description

Introduction The quality of reporting of abstracts of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in major general medical journals and in some category-specific journals was shown to be poor before the publication of the ConsolidatedStandards of ReportingTrials (CONSORT) extension for abstracts in 2008, and an improvement in the quality of reporting of abstracts was observed after its publication. The effect of the publication of the CONSORT extension for abstracts on the quality of reporting of RCTs in emergency medicine journals has not been studied. In this paper, we present the protocol of a systematic survey of the literature, aimed at assessing the quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in emergency medicine journals and at evaluating the effect of the publication of the CONSORT extension for abstracts on the quality of reporting. Methods and analysis The Medline database will be searched for RCTs published in the years 2005–2007 and 2014–2015 in the top 10 emergency medicine journals, according to their impact factor. Candidate studies will be screened for inclusion in the review. Exclusion criteria will be the following: the abstract is not available, they are published only as abstracts, still recruiting, or duplicate publications. The study outcomes will be the overall quality of reporting (number of items reported) according to the CONSORT extension and the compliance with its individual items. Two independent reviewers will screen each article for inclusion and will extract data on the CONSORT items and on other variables, which can possibly affect the quality of reporting. Ethics and dissemination This is a library-based study and therefore exempt from research ethics board review. The review results will be disseminated through abstract submission to conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal.

yearjournalcountryeditionlanguage
2017-04-01BMJ Open
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014981http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5566942