6533b7ddfe1ef96bd12740c1

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The quality of plasma collected by automated apheresis and of recovered plasma from leukodepleted whole blood.

Peter HellsternWalter E. HitzlerHannelore HaubeltStefan Runkel

subject

AdultMaleImmunologyProtein SImmunoglobulin GCitric AcidAndrologyFactor IXLeukocyte CountPlasmaImmunology and AllergyHumansFactor XIWhole bloodClotting factorHemostasisFactor VIIIbiologyChemistryAnticoagulantsFactor VFibrinogenHematologyMiddle AgedApheresisCoagulationHemostasisImmunologybiology.proteinBlood Component RemovalFemaleLeukocyte ElastasePlatelet factor 4

description

Background There exists a current lack of information about the composition of the different types of plasma. No direct comparisons between apheresis plasma (AP) and recovered plasma (RP) derived from in-line-filtered whole blood (WB) have been published to date. Study design and methods Sixty AP units, 100 RP units from in-line-filtered WB held for 3 hours at 20 degrees C between donation and freezing, and an additional 100 RP units held for 15 hours at 20 degrees C before freezing were analyzed for coagulation factors and inhibitors, total protein, immunoglobulin G (IgG), and hemostasis and proteolysis activation markers. The influence of twice freezing and thawing on clotting factors V, VIII, and XI was also examined. Results AP contains substantially greater activities of factor (F) V, FVIII, F IX, and FXI than RP frozen within 3 hours after WB donation. Prolonged holding of RP at 20 degrees C for more than 15 hours caused an additional reduction in FVIII, FXI, and protein S activities. Significantly greater levels of prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, platelet factor 4, and neutrophil elastase were found in RP compared with AP. IgG was lower in AP compared with RP. Twice freezing and thawing caused a marked drop in FV, FVIII, and FXI activity. Conclusion Higher FVIII and F IX potencies in AP compared with RP can be expected to result in greater yields when used for purification of these clotting factors. AP is presumably more efficient than RP for treating coagulopathies. RP, however, may contain higher IgG levels than AP.

10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04276.xhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15752162