6533b7ddfe1ef96bd12748ea

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Predictor variables for a 100-km race time in male ultra-marathoners.

Romuald LepersPatrizia KnechtleBeat KnechtleThomas Rosemann

subject

AdultMaleCompetitive BehaviorTime FactorsPhysical fitnessExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyPredictor variablesBivariate analysisAthletic PerformanceRunningHumansMathematicsAnthropometrybusiness.industryStepwise regressionAnthropometryMiddle AgedCircumferenceSensory SystemsCompetitive behaviorPhysical FitnessPhysical EndurancebusinessBody mass indexSwitzerlandDemography

description

In 169 male 100-km ultra-marathoners, the variables of anthropometry, training, and prerace experience, in order to predict race time, were investigated. In the bivariate analysis, age ( r = .24), body mass ( r = .20), Body Mass Index ( r = .29), circumference of upper arm ( r = .26), percent body fat (r = .45), mean weekly running hours ( r = –.21), mean weekly running kilometers ( r = –.43), mean speed in training ( r = –.56), personal best time in a marathon ( r = .65), the number of finished 100-km ultra-runs ( r = .24), and the personal best time in a 100-km ultra-run ( r = .72) were associated with race time. Stepwise multiple regression showed that training speed ( p < .0001), mean weekly running kilometers ( p < .0001), and age ( p < .0001) were the best correlations for a 100-km race time. Performance may be predicted ( n = 169, r2 = .43) by the following equation: 100-km race time (min) = 1, 085.60 – 36.26 × (training speed, km/hr.) −1.43 × (training volume, km/wk.) + 2.50 × (age, yr.). Overall, intensity of training might be more important for a successful outcome in a 100-km race than anthropometric attributes. Motivation to train intensely for such an ultra-endurance run should be explored as this might be the key for a successful finish.

10.2466/05.25.pms.111.6.681-693https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21319608