6533b7ddfe1ef96bd12749bc
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The relationship of ocular geometry with refractive error in normal and low birth weight adults
Philipp S. WildAlexander K. SchusterMichael S. UrschitzManfred E. BeutelAchim FießKarl J. LacknerThomas MünzelNorbert PfeifferStefan NickelsAndreas Schulzsubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyRefractive errorBiometrygenetic structuresEpidemiologyBirth weightPopulationRefraction OcularAxial lengthBirth weightOphthalmologyLinear regressionMyopiamedicineHumansProspective StudieseducationMathematicseducation.field_of_studyInfant NewbornContrast (statistics)Axial lengthInfant Low Birth WeightRefractive Errorsmedicine.diseaseRefractioneye diseasesRefractionLow birth weightFemaleOriginal Articlesense organsmedicine.symptomCorneal curvatureOptometrydescription
Purpose Low birth weight (BW) individuals have an increased risk for myopic refractive error. However, it is unclear which ocular geometric alterations lead to an increase in myopic refractive error. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ocular biometry in interaction with BW on refractive error. Methods Participants of the prospective, observational, population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) with self-reported BW aged 40–80 years and objective refraction and optical biometry were included. Linear regression analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between spherical equivalent with corneal power, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and axial length and its interaction with BW adjusted for age and sex. Low BW was defined as BW<2500 g and normal BW between 2500−4000 g. Results Overall, 5123 participants were included. Linear regression showed an interaction of axial length (B = 0.009/100 g, p = 0.002) with BW on spherical equivalent while corneal power, anterior chamber depth and lens thickness revealed no interaction with BW on refractive error. Furthermore, linear regression analysis revealed, that axial length explains 58% of variance of spherical equivalent in low BW subjects, and 54% in normal BW subjects. In contrast, corneal power explained 1% of variance of spherical equivalent in both groups. Conclusions Our results indicate that axial length variation explains the majority of variance in refractive error, while steeper corneal shape has no conclusive effects on refractive error. Low BW is not linked to effects of steeper corneal shape on myopic refractive error, while the effect of axial length on myopia is fractionally enlarged in those subjects.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-03-31 | Journal of Optometry |