6533b7ddfe1ef96bd12749d6
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Patient outcomes in two steroid-free regimens using tacrolimus monotherapy after daclizumab induction and tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantation.
Itxarone BilbaoThomas BeckerMichele ColledanJacques PirenneJeno JárayHelena IsoniemiAngel BernardosSusanne BeckebaumDaniel FoltysDavide D'amicosubject
Graft RejectionLiver CirrhosisMaleDaclizumabmedicine.medical_treatment030230 surgeryLiver transplantationGastroenterology0302 clinical medicineDaclizumabAdrenal Cortex HormonesSafety outcomeAntibacterial agentLiver NeoplasmsAntibodies Monoclonal3. Good healthTreatment OutcomeAcute DiseaseCorticosteroid030211 gastroenterology & hepatologyDrug Therapy CombinationFemaleImmunosuppressive Agentsmedicine.drugAdultmedicine.medical_specialtymedicine.drug_classchemical and pharmacologic phenomenaAntibodies Monoclonal HumanizedMycophenolic acidTacrolimusABO Blood-Group System03 medical and health sciencesInternal medicinemedicineHumansTransplantationTacrolimus monotherapybusiness.industryPatient SelectionSteroid-free immunosuppressionMycophenolic AcidSurvival AnalysisTacrolimusSurgeryLiver TransplantationCalcineurinstomatognathic diseasesRegimenImmunoglobulin Gbusinessdescription
Introduction. Long-term steroid administration may predispose liver transplant recipients to infectious and metabolic complication. Maintaining effective immunoprophylaxis while minimizing the negative consequences of steroid therapy could be a key factor in improving clinical outcomes.Methods. Six hundred two patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus (TAC) immunosuppression with a single-steroid bolus and two doses of daclizumab (DAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).Results. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 19.7% in the TAC/DAC group and 16.2% in the TAC/ MMF group (ns). Three-month patient and graft survival were similar. Steroid use at month-3 was low at 5.5% in the TAC/DAC group and 3.9% in the TAC/MMF group. Significantly higher incidences of causally related adverse events (AEs) and significantly more dose modifications, interruptions, or discontinuations due to an AE were reported with TAC/MMF. Study withdrawal due to leucopenia was significantly higher with TAC/MMF (0.0% vs. 1.7%. P <= 0.05). AEs were generally reported less frequently in the TAC/DAC group. However, specifically headache and Supraventricular arrhythmia were significantly higher with TAC/DAC, whereas leucopenia and bacterial infection were significantly higher with TAC/MMF. Laboratory indices of renal function were similar, and increases in serum lipids were negligible in both groups. Incidences of de novo diabetes mellitus (>= 2 fasting plasma glucose values >= 7.0 mmol/L) were low at 9.5% (TAC/DAC) and 11.0% (TAC/MMF).Conclusion. Both TAC-based regimens allowed optimization of immunoprophylaxis while eliminating some of the negative consequences associated with steroids. Efficacy outcomes were comparable; however, TAC monotherapy after DAC induction was associated with significantly less leucopenia and less bacterial infection than a dual regimen incorporating MMF.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2008-12-24 | Transplantation |