6533b7ddfe1ef96bd1274b49

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Prostate health index (PHI) as a reliable biomarker for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luisa AgnelloMatteo VidaliRosaria Vincenza GiglioCaterina Maria GambinoAnna Maria CiaccioBruna Lo SassoMarcello Ciaccio

subject

MalePCaprostate tumordiagnosisscreeningBiopsyBiochemistry (medical)Clinical BiochemistryProstateProstatic NeoplasmsGeneral MedicineProstate-Specific AntigenSettore BIO/12 - Biochimica Clinica E Biologia Molecolare Clinicaclinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)biomarkerHumansprostate health index (PHI)Biomarkers

description

Abstract Objectives Prostate cancer (PCa) represents the second most common solid cancer in men worldwide. In the last decades, the prostate health index (PHI) emerged as a reliable biomarker for detecting PCa and differentiating between non-aggressive and aggressive forms. However, before introducing it in clinical practice, more evidence is required. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for assessing the diagnostic performance of PHI for PCa and for detecting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Methods Relevant publications were identified by a systematic literature search on PubMed and Web of Science from inception to January 11, 2022. Results Sixty studies, including 14,255 individuals, met the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PHI for PCa detection was 0.791 (95%CI 0.739–0.834) and 0.625 (95%CI 0.560–0.686), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PHI for csPCa detection was 0.874 (95%CI 0.803–0.923) and 0.569 (95%CI 0.458–0.674), respectively. Additionally, the diagnostic odds ratio was 6.302 and 9.206, respectively, for PCa and csPCa detection, suggesting moderate to good effectiveness of PHI as a diagnostic test. Conclusions PHI has a high accuracy for detecting PCa and discriminating between aggressive and non-aggressive PCa. Thus, it could be useful as a biomarker in predicting patients harbouring more aggressive cancer and guiding biopsy decisions.

10.1515/cclm-2022-0354https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35567430