6533b7ddfe1ef96bd12752e4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The effect of swinging the arms on muscle activation and production of leg force during ski skating at different skiing speeds

Stefan LindingerOlli OhtonenWalter RappCaroline GöpfertCaroline GöpfertErich MüllerVesa Linnamo

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyVastus medialisBiophysicsarm swingExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyKnee extensionBicepsLeg muscle03 medical and health sciencesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationEMGSkiingmedicineHumansOrthopedics and Sports MedicineRange of Motion ArticularMuscle Skeletalta315MathematicsLegMuscle activation030229 sport sciencesGeneral MedicineSwingBiomechanical Phenomenabody regionsArm swingAthletesski forcesPhysical therapyArmRange of motionhuman activitiescross-country skiing030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

The study investigated the effects of arm swing during leg push-off in V2-alternate/G4 skating on neuromuscular activation and force production by the leg muscles. Nine skilled cross-country skiers performed V2-alternate skating without poles at moderate, high, and maximal speeds, both with free (SWING) and restricted arm swing (NOSWING). Maximal speed was 5% greater in SWING (P<0.01), while neuromuscular activation and produced forces did not differ between techniques. At both moderate and high speed the maximal (2% and 5%, respectively) and average (both 5%) vertical force and associated impulse (10% and 14%) were greater with SWING (all P<0.05). At high speed range of motion and angular velocity of knee flexion were 24% greater with SWING (both P<0.05), while average EMG of m. biceps femoris was 31% lower (all P<0.05) in SWING. In a similar manner, the average EMG of m. vastus medialis and m. biceps femoris were lower (17% and 32%, P<0.05) during the following knee extension. Thus, swinging the arms while performing V2-alternate can enhance both maximal speed and skiing economy at moderate and, in particularly, high speeds.

10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.009https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.009