6533b7defe1ef96bd1276870

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Sorafenib for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Gerd OttoChristoph DüberMaria Hoppe-lotichiusMarcus SchuchmannIna M. NiederleMichael HeiseMarcus-alexander WörnsSandra KochPeter R. GalleArndt Weinmann

subject

OncologySorafenibAdultMaleNiacinamidemedicine.medical_specialtyCarcinoma HepatocellularPyridinesmedicine.medical_treatmentAntineoplastic AgentsLiver transplantationTacrolimusInternal medicinemedicineHumansAdverse effectAgedRetrospective StudiesSirolimusChemotherapyHepatologybusiness.industryPhenylurea CompoundsBenzenesulfonatesLiver NeoplasmsGastroenterologyImmunosuppressionMiddle AgedSorafenibmedicine.diseasedigestive system diseasesLiver TransplantationRadiation therapyHepatocellular carcinomaFemaleNeoplasm Recurrence LocalLiver cancerbusinessImmunosuppressive Agentsmedicine.drug

description

Abstract Background Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after orthotopic liver transplantation not amenable to surgical approaches is associated with poor outcome. Aims Retrospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in patients with post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Methods Patients with post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence were treated with sorafenib. Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria of AEs version 3.0, tumour response was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Results First-line therapy after recurrence was surgery ( n  = 6), radiation therapy ( n  = 1), chemotherapy ( n  = 1), and sorafenib ( n  = 3). Finally, 11 patients were treated with sorafenib. Nine patients (82%) received an additionally targeted therapy with sirolimus as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. Most common grade 3 adverse events included diarrhoea (46%), hand-foot skin reaction (27%), nausea, fatigue, and leucopoenia (all 18%). Sorafenib had to be discontinued in two patients due to adverse events and six additional patients required a dose adjustment. No deterioration of liver graft function occurred. Median time to progression was 4.1 months; however, patients were treated with ongoing sorafenib in case of clinical benefit (median 8.9 months). Median overall survival after initiation of sorafenib treatment was 20.1 months. Conclusion Sorafenib in combination with immunosuppression including sirolimus may be administered to patients with post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence with acceptable toxicity and without deterioration of liver graft function.

10.1016/j.dld.2011.12.009https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22424640