6533b81ffe1ef96bd1277381
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Liver stiffness quantification in biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients using shear wave elastography in comparison with transient elastography
Domenica MatrangaMassimo MidiriRoberto CannellaGiovanni CaruanaVito Di MarcoTommaso Vincenzo BartolottaSalvatore PettaGabriele BusèAdele Taibbisubject
nonalcoholic fatty liver diseasemedicine.medical_specialtyGastroenterologySettore MED/01 - Statistica Medica030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineLiver stiffnessInternal medicineStatistical significanceBiopsyNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseMedical technologymedicineRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingnonalcoholic steatohepatitisR855-855.5shear wave elastographymedicine.diagnostic_testReceiver operating characteristicbusiness.industryNonalcoholic fatty liver disease Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Shear wave elastography Transient elastography Liver stiffnessmedicine.diseasetransient elastographyliver stiffnessLiver biopsyOriginal Article030211 gastroenterology & hepatologyElastographySettore MED/36 - Diagnostica Per Immagini E RadioterapiabusinessTransient elastographydescription
Purpose: This study prospectively assessed the performance of liver stiffness measurements using point shear-wave elastography (p-SWE) in comparison with transient elastography (TE) in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: Fifty-six consecutive adult patients with a histological diagnosis of NAFLD prospectively underwent TE and p-SWE on the same day. The median of 10 measurements (SWE-10), the first five (SWE-5), and the first three (SWE-3) measurements were analyzed for p-SWE. Liver biopsy was considered as the reference standard for liver fibrosis grade. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were calculated to assess the performance of TE and p-SWE for the diagnosis of significant (F2-F4) and advanced fibrosis (F3-F4). Results: Forty-six patients (27 men, 19 women; mean age, 54.7±9.1 years) had valid p-SWE and TE measurements. Twenty-seven patients (58.7%) had significant fibrosis and 18 (39.1%) had advanced fibrosis. For significant fibrosis, both SWE-10 (AUROC, 0.787; P=0.002) and SWE- 5 (AUROC, 0.809; P=0.001) provided higher diagnostic performance than TE (AUROC, 0.719; P=0.016) and SWE-3 (AUROC, 0.714; P=0.021), albeit without statistical significance (P=0.301). For advanced fibrosis, SWE-5 showed higher diagnostic performance (AUROC, 0.809; P<0.001) than TE (AUROC, 0.799; P<0.001), SWE-10 (AUROC, 0.797; P<0.001), and SWE-3 (AUROC, 0.736; P=0.003), although the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.496). The optimal SWE-10 and SWE-5 cutoff values were ≥8.4 and ≥7.8 for significant fibrosis, and ≥9.1 and ≥8.8 for advanced fibrosis, respectively. Conclusion: TE and p-SWE showed similar performance for the diagnosis of significant and advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-07-01 | Ultrasonography |