6533b81ffe1ef96bd1277ddc
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy of online interventions targeting resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis
David Daniel EbertAmanda Díaz-garcíaRocío HerreroRocío HerreroMarvin FrankeCristina BotellaCristina Botellasubject
AdultAdolescentmedia_common.quotation_subjectPoolingMEDLINEPsychological interventionlaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePromotion (rank)BiasRandomized controlled triallaw0502 economics and businessHumansAcademicSubjects/MED00860AcademicSubjects/SOC01210030212 general & internal medicineResilience (network)resilienceinternet-based resilience interventionsPart I: Evidencemedia_commonMental Disorders05 social sciencesPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthMental healthMental HealthMeta-analysisPsychologyAcademicSubjects/SOC02610Internet-Based Interventionmental health050203 business & managementClinical psychologydescription
Abstract Background There is a growing interest in the promotion of mental health, and concepts as resilience are re-emerging and taking relevance. In addition, Information and Communication Technologies can provide potential benefits in the field of mental health, and the treatment of mental disorders in particular. This study aims to synthesize the evidence of internet-based resilience interventions, analyzing the theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy. Methods A systematic search was performed. The eligibility criteria stated for this article were: randomized controlled trials targeted at adults or adolescents and including any psychological intervention focussing on resilience in its rationale or design. Studies with direct (e.g. resilience scales) and proximal resilience measures (e.g. scales on well-being) were included. Risk of bias was assessed for each trial using Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool. Two reviewers worked independently in order to identify potential articles. A total of 11 articles were selected. A random-effects pooling model using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method based on direct and proximal resilience measures at post-test was used. Results The overall effects of online resilience training compared to control groups at post-test were not significant; the effect size concerning the improvement of resilience was g=0.12 (95% CI: −0.14 to 0.38). In addition, a potential association between the type of outcome and the effect size could be revealed. Conclusions The results of the present meta-analysis showed that the overall effect of online resilience trainings was not significant. Nonetheless, a tendency for a higher benefit for resilience was found in the studies with a clear assessment theory, indicating some promising effects. Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42018083339.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-07-01 | European Journal of Public Health |