6533b81ffe1ef96bd1278621
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Prevalence and Risk Factors of PAD among Patients with Elevated ABI
Maarit VenermoTaina RantanenJ. SaarinenVelipekka SuominenJuha-pekka Saleniussubject
MaleBrachial ArteryArterial diseaseBlood PressureCoronary DiseaseIschemiaRisk FactorsOdds RatioPrevalenceMedicineMediasclerosisReferral and ConsultationFinlandAged 80 and overPeripheral Vascular DiseasesGangreneMedicine(all)SmokingMiddle AgedPeripheralFemalemedicine.symptomCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicinemedicine.medical_specialtyOutpatient Clinics HospitalAnkle brachial pressure indexRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityAge DistributionPredictive Value of TestsInternal medicinePeripheral arterial diseaseHumansIn patientClinical significancecardiovascular diseasesPhotoplethysmographyAgedRetrospective Studiesbusiness.industryExtremitiesmedicine.diseaseIntermittent claudicationCoronary heart diseaseSurgerybody regionsToe Brachial IndexKidney Failure ChronicSurgeryAnklebusinessdescription
ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence and clinical significance of elevated ankle-brachial index (ABI) in patients referred to vascular consultation.DesignRetrospective clinical study.Material and methodsIn 1,762 patients referred with a suspicion of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), ABI and toe brachial index (TBI) were measured by photoplethysmography. ABI≥1.3 was considered falsely elevated and TBI<0.60 was the diagnostic criterion for PAD.ResultsThe prevalence of elevated ABI was 8.4% and that of PAD among these patients 62.2%. PAD was significantly more prevalent among subjects with severe symptoms (rest pain, ulcers or gangrene) than in those with intermittent claudication (83.8% and 45.3%, respectively, p<0.001). The risk of PAD diagnosis was ten-fold (OR 10.31, 95% CI 2.07–51.30) among those with chronic renal failure, five-fold among patients with a history of smoking (OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.22–26.00) and over three-fold (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.46–8.12) among those with coronary heart disease. The specificities of elevated ABI threshold levels (1.3, 1.4 and 1.5) in identifying PAD were 86%, 94% and 96%, respectively, the sensitivities being 44%, 38% and 36%, respectively.ConclusionsThe prevalence of elevated ABI in patients referred to vascular consultation is 8.4% and that of PAD among these 62.2%. PAD is significantly more probable among those with chronic renal failure, a history of smoking and coronary heart disease. Furthermore, the specificity of elevated ABI (≥1.3) in recognizing PAD is good, whereas the sensitivity is only satisfactory.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2008-06-01 | European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery |